View Cart
Free Shipping

Archive for July, 2009

Injinji Performance Socks

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

By Donald Buraglio

Before we get to the review, let me clearly state my bias for the record: when it comes to socks, I’m completely, head over heels, ‘I’d get down on one knee and offer my final rose’ in love with Drymax. Having said that, I’m aware that there are other fish in the sea … and in my evolving role as a product guru, I’m more than happy to try other brands to see how they measure up.

Injinji is a fairly well-known commodity among ultrarunners. They enjoy a devoted following, and the company is affiliated with many high-profile events – such as a little race I completed in Auburn last month. The company sponsors four separate teams, in adventure racing, triathlon, ultrarunning, and regular running (although the distinction between running and ultrarunning seems quite blurry, as the running roster features a very popular blogger who has also become a fantastic ultrarunner). In other words, Injinji is out there, supporting endurance athletes and events in growing numbers since their inception about ten years ago.

injinji_logo

As the official sock sponsor of the Western States 100, Injinji sent a pair to all entrants in advance of the 2008 non-race. This spring, when Wilderness Running Company sent me another sample, I figured that receiving two free pairs was some sort of sign that I should sit down and write a formal review. So away we go.

Obviously, Injinji are distinctive for their patented tetratsok design, which is a cool (if hard to spell) word they invented to describe the separate toe coverings; it’s the foot equivalent of putting your fingers into a glove instead of a mitten. This design has several intended benefits: it enables your entire foot to perform in a more biomechanically natural manner, and prevents the moisture buildup and “toe on toe” friction that leads to blisters.

PMCBLK_1_1

(On a completely unrelated note, the tetratsok design has another fringe benefit: on summer mornings when I want to roll out of bed and slide into a pair of shorts and flip-flops for lounging around the house but my toes feel kind of chilly, I can put on a pair of Injinjis and still wear the flip-flops while warming up my toes. Sure, I look like a nerd – but the rest of my family has long since made that conclusion, so my overall rep is pretty much unchanged.)

Sock nerd in the house!

Sock nerd in the house!

Injinjis are also very comfortable to wear, which was one of my concerns before trying them out. The individual toe sleeves are seamless, and the fabric blend feels very nice against the skin. The performance sock (the model I tested) features wicking CoolMax on the skin side and nylon on the outside, which help moisture transfer during long, hot activities. The double-layered welt top holds the shape of the sock and keeps all the parts positioned where they’re supposed to be.

Nevertheless, Injinji’s primary marketing strategy isn’t related to the sock’s comfort – it’s in how the sock helps your foot perform more naturally while running.

This “natural running” idea is one that’s gradually gaining traction in the fitness world, and one that’s been especially intriguing to me in recent months. I’ll explain more about my own interest in a separate post next week – but it’s important to note that Injinji has historically been way ahead of this curve. The company was founded with the primary intention of maintaining the foot’s natural anatomy and function in a way that traditional socks couldn’t match – basically, to mimic the feel of running barefoot.

There’s a difference you can feel with your very first run in a pair of Injinjis: instead of just rolling over the ground as a single cohesive unit, your toes immediately start shifting, adjusting, and gripping differently in response to each footfall. It feels a bit odd at first, but once you realize what’s going on, it’s kind of a cool thing to experience – it’s like your toes are waking up and saying “Hey! We can do whatever we want in here! This is great!”

From a biomechanical standpoint, this makes perfect sense: the toes were created (or possibly, evolved by mutation and completely random happenstance – that’s a separate discussion) to facilitate balance, stability, and forward propulsion of the foot. Injinji socks allow this process to happen, but how much functional benefit you actually gain is difficult to assess – which leads to the primary drawback I found with Injinjis.

If your intent is to replicate the function of the human foot while running, the socks you’re wearing can only go so far. A vastly more important factor in this regard is the type of footwear you use; if you’re wearing Injinjis in a pair of motion-thwarting stability shoes, or with artificial arch supports, or in bulky shoes with an elevated heel and hugely cushioned midsole, the normal mechanics of your feet are so stringently diminished that the socks you’re wearing probably can’t make up for it.

Fortunately, there seems to be a clear “less is more” revolution taking place with trail running footwear – as evidenced by the lightweight yet durable La Sportiva models (the Crosslite and Wildcat) I reviewed recently, and by other brands of footwear that strip away as many impediments to the natural function of the foot as possible (spoiler alert – this is also a HUGE hint for an upcoming review I’ve got on deck this summer).

One other small criticism of the Injinjis is the lack of variability in fit. More specifically, the toes of the tetratsok get progressively shorter from big toe to pinky toe – but my 2nd toe (would that that my index toe?) is longer than my big toe, so the fit of the sleeves feel slightly irregular on either side. It’s not enough of a problem to keep me from wearing them – just a little something else for me to gripe about.

DSCN3999

At Rest

Overall, the Injinjis are an interesting option if you’re looking to explore the possibilities of running with a more natural feel. They’re also comfortable enough to wear with your regular trail shoes for moisture management and blister prevention.

***

Men’s Injinji Performance Socks Store Page>>

Women’s Injini Performance Socks Store Page>>

***

Sugoi R+R Calf Compression Socks

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

By Stuart Barrington

sugoi_grey

From Sugoi’s website, the sock’s features include:

  • Structured cushioning at footbed
  • Dense cushioning at heel and toe where maximum impact occurs
  • Mesh ventilation for improved breathability
  • Lin-Toe reverse toe construction
  • “Y” heel gore for improved fit, reducing slippage
  • Progressive support from arch band to top welt
  • 156N Hydrophobic/hydrophillic yarn combinations
  • Anatomically correct left and right foot construction
  • Lace pad cushioning

My Impressions

Like most quality socks, the R&Rs have a foot-specific design. The first thing you notice is the various levels of compression that the sock provides: it is graduated throughout the leg section of the sock and also through the foot area. This is interesting and I wonder if the different zones are designed based on the different needs of various muscles, tendons, soft tissues, etc. For example, there is less compression on the toes, top of the foot (to make room for the lacing) and achilles area, and more in the calf area, where it is pretty tight. The heel construction is a little different from most socks which ‘turn’ a heel. The R&Rs have a Y shape that contours towards your heel from the front of your ankle and has a virtually invisible seam. The toe seam is also barely visible, which minimizes hot spot or blister points.

Internally the sole of the sock is cushioned. This cushioning is not flat, but rather is staged in little ‘islands’ along the length of the foot with a fully cushioned heel. I am not sure if this is based on reflexology or massage points in the foot, or not, but it is very effective. I have used these for post-run recovery and have run a couple of 10 milers in them, including the second run of a back to back session on long weekends (20m+/10m+). My initial worry that they would be hot was unfounded, as they breathe very well. With local temperatures going north of 100f in the last two weeks, this is a very good thing. The cushioning works well, which is an advantage, in my opinion, over socks that have no cushioning. The elasticity is also very effective and they do not lose any stretchiness during a run or, particularly, overnight, which is something I have experienced with other compression socks.

Colorwise they come in sensible grey but the white trim, including some discreet logos, gives them a bit more personality than some socks; better for running, not so good for work on a Monday morning. Fit-wise, the R&Rs easily reached all the way up my calf to just below my knee. (I had the size large and my calf measures 18″ from ankle to below the knee.)

Overall, these are a solid pair of compression socks by a reputable company. The big advantage for me over foot-less calf sleeves is the fact I could run in them, which gives them additional bang for your buck. And that’s never a bad thing.

***

Sugoi R+R Store Page>>

***

La Sportiva Wildcat

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

If I told you that you should buy trail running shoes from a company that specializes in wooden clogs and lumberjack boots, would you be interested? At first glance, probably not.

But if I went on to tell you that the company has a long history of producing durable mountain gear, and that they’ve expanded their original focus to include footwear for rock climbing, alpine hiking and adventure running, you’d be a bit more curious, right?

What if I continued to explain that the company has become one of the biggest supporters of ultrarunning over the past several years, sponsoring multiple race series and a team of elite trail runners? Or that they provide exclusive gear for the most hardcore mountaineers and high-altitude athletes all over the world? Or that the company’s shoes were worn by winners of the Western States and Hardrock 100-Mile races? You’d definitely pay attention then, wouldn’t you?

Readers, meet La Sportiva.

Sportiva

Considering that the company is relatively novel to many trail runners out there, it’s remarkable to learn that La Sportiva has been around for more than 80 years. They originated, and are still headquartered, in a small mountain town at the foot of the Dolomites in northern Italy. (Reflecting their origins, it makes sense that La Sportiva very seldom uses the words “trail running” for their gear – they prefer the phrase “mountain running”.) It has remained a family business that passes expertise down from one generation to the next, while collaborating with its sponsored athletes to push the boundaries of innovation for high performance.

They’re also a very generous company, as reflected in their extensive sponsorships (check that roster for this year’s Western States women’s champion and the Hardrock men’s winner), promotional efforts (they even have two blogs!) and race series awards – especially at a time when many other companies are withdrawing or limiting financial support of amateur athletes. I’ve wanted to establish a relationship with LaSportiva for quite some time, so I was thrilled when I got the opportunity to review two different shoe models from their current line.

Today’s review features the Wildcat, which is billed as a stable, neutral shoe – and the most cushioned shoe in the LaSportiva line.

wildcat

Men’s Wildcat

That description doesn’t mean the shoe is bulky – in fact, the immediate observation I had about both models (the Wildcat and the Crosslite, which will be reviewed next time) is how sleek and light they feel straight out of the box; they’re the shoe version of an Italian sports car. And it’s probably not a coincidence that LaSportiva shoes are endearingly nicknamed “Sporties” by runners who’ve used them. They trigger a primitive reaction of sorts – you put them on your feet, and you instantly feel like running fast.

The Wildcat weighs just 12 oz, with a low profile around the ankle, and a slipper-like feel through the forefoot aided by an even-tension lacing system and a thin, breathable sockliner. I felt like I could run a 50K in these shoes right out the door – they were instantly comfortable and responsive without any breaking-in period. Adding to the lightweight feel of the shoes are AirMesh uppers, through which you can literally feel air moving with each stride. The AirMesh provides this cool ventilation while preventing dirt and debris from getting through to your socks.

Wildcat_W_1

Womens’ Wildcat

Fortunately, being lightweight doesn’t sacrifice the shoe’s toughness. There’s a molded piece called a Transkinetic Heel Stabilizer at the back of the shoe to help with stability on rugged surfaces, and some rubber-dipped mesh for extra protection in vulnerable areas like the tip of the forefoot to keep clumsy runners from injuring themselves too often.

LaSportiva prides itself in its outsole traction, and the Wildcat uses their patented FriXion AT rubber which maximizes grip and responsiveness on the most slippery and treacherous terrain. Basically, the rubber is softer and stickier than the outsoles of most other shoes, but die-cut and angled in various directions throughout the sole to enhance braking and minimize slippage while also adding to the cushioned feel of the shoe.

traction

Men’s Wildcat

In practice, the traction control of the Wildcat is quite remarkable. I used these shoes during the first 30 miles of the Western States 100, on high country terrain featuring lots of loose rocks and long stretches of trail that were submerged in spring runoff. I didn’t have any missteps, and I felt so confident going through slick, rocky sections of trail that I frequently charged right down the middle of extended water channels that many other runners slowed to tiptoe around.

Overall, I was very impressed with the performance of the Wildcats, with a couple of caveats. The first is that, given my size (6′2″) and pronation tendency, the neutral support and low profile of this shoe takes some getting used to. I transitioned to the Wildcats from a pair of Montrail Hardrocks, and at first it felt like the foot equivalent of climbing out of a Hummer and into a Ferrari – you can definitely move faster, but you’re going to feel like you’re rolling all over the road for a little while. If you’re accustomed to a sturdier shoe, LaSportiva has a model called the Lynx which is built up slightly more than the Wildcat and marketed toward heavier runners.

The other drawback I found was that on the steep downhill sections of the Western States trail, I had a bit of contact on both sides of the toebox. Sporties use a narrower cut through the forefoot than most other brands (especially compared to Montrails), and although that slipper-like fit is generally very comfortable, it might be an issue on steep slopes if you have fat toes like me.

I was confident enough in these shoes to lace them up for Western States, but I was wary that the toebox situation might become a problem, so that was the reason for the shoe change I described in my race report. I had my “old reliable” Montrails waiting for me at Robinson Flat (mile 30) just in case I needed them – and when I arrived there, I didn’t have any blisters or major problems, but the concern was noticeable enough that I didn’t want to risk the next 70 miles and much steeper canyons that awaited. However, I’ve continued to wear the Wildcats since race day without problems – it’s only on those super-long, super-steep days that I might think twice about them.

If you’re looking for a very comfortable, durable, all-purpose trail running (oops – I mean mountain running) shoe that makes you feel like a speedster, and interested in supporting a dynamic company that invests time, effort, and money to the world of ultrarunning, the La Sportiva Wildcat will make an excellent addition to your gear closet.

Cross-posted at Running and Rambling.

***

Men’s Wildcat Store Page>>

Women’s Wildcat Store Page>>

***

La Sportiva Crosslite

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

By Donald Buraglio

I’ve put about 100 miles on my La Sportiva Crosslites, and I’ve found it to be a truly remarkable shoe.

crosslite gear

Truthfully, I’m a little late to jump on the Crosslite bandwagon: the shoe has already won a handful of “best in category” awards, including a Best Buy award from Runner’s World magazine and a Gear of the Year designation from Outside magazine. So it’s not exactly a secret that the Crosslite is outstanding; the only question is what type of mountain running this model is best suited for.

On that point, it’s worth noting a few differences between the Crosslite and the Wildcat, and from other shoes in the La Sportiva line. While all of the classic La Sportiva characteristics that I described in the Wildcat review – lightweight, low-profile, slipper-like comfort right out of the box – are present in this model, the Crosslite also has some distinguishing features to set it apart from the rest of the line.

outsole

The primary difference is on the underside of the Crosslite. La Sportiva’s patented FriXion AT rubber is still utilized, but the lugs are much larger than the ones on the Wildcat, and spaced further apart. The wide spacing helps the sole shed mud more easily – which, combined with the outstanding traction of the soft, sticky FriXion rubber, make this model ideal for mucky, sloppy, muddy conditions.

The sole also features La Sportiva’s Impact Braking System, which is the official designation for the layout I described in my Wildcat review: namely, the outsole lugs are oriented in opposing slanted directions. The result, according the La Sportiva website, is a 20% increase in braking power and a 20% decrease in impact forces. It also helps explain why La Sportiva shoes have a nicely cushioned feel even without the thick midsole that most trail shoes rely upon for shock absorption.

Having said that, the Crosslite isn’t quite as well cushioned as the Wildcat (despite being very similar in weight, at roughly 12 oz.), and therefore may not be as well suited for super-long duration runs. The La Sportiva rep explained to me that the Wildcat is recommended for distances from 100K to 100M, and the Crosslite is recommended for anything shorter. (More on recommended uses in a minute.)

Another unique feature of the Crosslite is the external scree guard on top of the AirMesh upper, which is like having a gaiter on the top of your forefoot. La Sportiva’s even-torsion lacing system is used on this shoe, but only the top two eyelets are visible on the forefoot. The scree guard also keeps the lacing and the upper snug against the top of the foot, enhancing the fit of the shoe.

crosslite 2

The Crosslite has a 2.5-mm composite shank in the midfoot to help with torsional stability, but it lacks the heel stabilizer device seen on the Wildcat, so the disclaimer in my Wildcat review about transitioning gradually from a more stable trainer is especially pertinent with the Crosslite. This difference, plus the slight disparity in cushioning, are likely the rationale for using Wildcats instead of Crosslites for longer distance racing.

Like other shoes in the La Sportiva line, the Crosslite is meant for running fast; they’re built for elites to win races, and for regular schmoes to feel swift and light on the trail. My training group does a weekly 12-miler on hilly fire roads, which often double as long tempo runs for the marathoners among us. It’s the one run each week where I know I may be fighting to keep pace right from the gun – and it’s the one where I’m most grateful for having a pair of Crosslites to help me keep up.

Obviously, all the mainstream fuss over the Crosslite is very well-deserved.

Here are the conditions where I think it would be an exceptional choice:

  • Wet, muddy, messy technical conditions where traction is especially important.
  • Racing distances up to 50M.

Fast training days where you want to push the pace with intervals, tempo work, etc.

The Crosslite is a sleek, comfortable shoe that can handle any trail condition you encounter in training, and help you lower your PRs on race day.

***

La Sportiva Crosslite Store Page>>

***

Sock Shootout: Bridgedale, Darn Tough, Drymax

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

By Nick Clark

Of these three sock manufacturers, I was well aware of Drymax, had heard of Darn Tough, and was completely in the dark about Bridgedale. This of course says nothing about the socks, but everything about each company’s marketing efforts.

Drymax has launched a very successful grassroots marketing campaign that has largely centered on endurance athletes who, by and large, end up touting the socks for their wondrous ability to keep blisters at bay — something to do with the ‘wicking’ qualities of the materials used, which supposedly keeps moisture from lingering on and around the foot for too long.

I knew far less about Darn Tough, but I was familiar with the name, which I assumed was directly related to the materials the sock itself was made from. If this is the case, as it turned out to be, then they immediately score high marks with me as there is nothing more frustrating than spending extra dollars on a premium pair of socks, only to be chucking them weeks later with wear holes threatening blisters.

As noted above, I had no prior knowledge of Bridgedale — the company or the sock — before receiving a review pair from Wilderness Running, so will begin this three-sock comparative review by talking to first impressions.

First Impressions

First impressions can of course be deceiving, but in this particular case the three socks being reviewed are so apparently different from a visual standpoint that a note on first impressions is well warranted.

  • Bridgedale X-Hale Multisport

Xhale MS

The Bridgedale has the look of a wool hiking sock with structural elements designed to keep the sock hugging the foot. This sock, with its wooly fuzziness looked more like a winter sock to me, but it also looked like a sock with good cushioning and all-around comfort — the chicken soup of running socks, if you like. The feel of these socks once on is actually one of padding and structure. The sock has additional padding in the heel, the toes and the balls of the feet, while also offering elastic fit bands around the ankle and over the top of the foot. Those areas not requiring elastic fit material, or extra padding (mainly the arch) are made of a thinner material that looks to be designed for moisture-removing purposes.

  • Drymax Lite Trail

Drymax Lite Trail

In stark contrast to the natural-fiber look of the Bridgedale, the Drymax Trail Running sock has an artificial polyester look about it. In addition, they look and feel very thick, and have a no-nonsense design to them (no outrageous colors or designs). The feel of the Drymax Trail Runner is one of padding. The inner bottom part of the sock has a terry-cloth look and feel that adds significant padding. In fact, the bulky padded feel had me a bit worried that it would result in tightness akin to that experienced with winter hiking socks. The upside on the feel was that the padding gives the socks a certain bounciness.

  • Darn Tough Merino Wool Mesh

Wool Mesh

The Darn Tough was easily the most exciting sock to my eye. The fibers looked natural, but at the same time well engineered with the promise of a very cozy, foot-hugging fit. Being much thinner than the other two socks, I was immediately thinking trail feel for my feet and excellent responsiveness. Out of the box, and with no wear testing, these were easily my favorite pair of socks. The look of these socks is not deceiving: they hugged my feet and felt thin enough that my toes definitely had an extra sense of feel than when in the other, more padded socks in this review.

The Run Test

  • Bridgedale X-Hale Multisport

Bridgedale1

Bridgedale2

The cushioning feels great in full stride and the sock is actually a lot cooler than it first appears. The material allows for good ventilation, while also providing the extra cushioning that might be the difference between a blister that cuts your race effort short, or allows you to keep going full tilt. The best thing I think I can probably say about this sock is that I never really think about it too much when I’m running, which means it is doing its job with no annoying rubbing on the seams or any constriction within the shoe. In my opinion, most premium running socks these days tend to be of a high quality, and this sock sits right there among them with no major downside that I could find.

  • Drymax Lite Trail

DM1

DM2

I was pretty concerned about the very padded nature of this sock before running in it, thinking that my foot would feel constricted inside the shoe. Therefore, my first run in these socks was in a pair of shoes that run a little big for me and usually require double socks. The Drymax sock felt great solo in my slightly oversized shoe, and the padding was a great surprise. Normally with padded running socks, I don’t feel a great difference, but there was a definite sense of pad and maybe even spring from the sock. Nice! Running in a tighter fitting shoe, such as the La Sportiva Crosslite, the sock actually compressed well, and rather than cause constricting discomfort, added an extra element of snugness to the already snug Crosslite, molding well with the shoe and filling it out perfectly. This was a pleasant and welcome surprise. As to the wicking and blister-reducing qualities of the sock, I’ll bow to the many (sponsored) athlete claims that they reduce blistering, as I am fortunate enough to rarely suffer from blisters; however, I do feel compelled to call Drymax out on the moisture wicking qualities of the sock. My feet simply did not feel they were any drier any sooner than with other premium socks after wading through a water hazard, and I put them through a few.

  • Darn Tough Merino Wool Mesh

DT1

DT2

As I mentioned in the opening section of the review, appearances can be deceptive. I loved this sock out the box for looks and non-running feel: a true foot hugger. However, I had issues with slippage within the shoe, particularly on inner soles with less friction than others. The sole of the sock has a certain sheen to it that translates to reduced friction with inner soles. I ran these socks in three pairs of shoes, and with the two Sportiva inner soles (Crosslites & Wildcats), the sock worked well and was as responsive as I originally thought it would be due to its thin, but tough, design. However, in combination with my Vasque Celerators, this sock has to go down as something of a disappointment, with an almost ski-on-snow feel to it within the shoe. I never ran this combo long enough to get into blister trouble, but on a long technical run, I definitely felt like even my elephant-skinned feet would succumb to bubbling. I would still recommend this as a good quality, responsive sock, but would recommend that runners pay attention to the shoes they are being paired with to avoid slippage within the shoe.

Wear

Well, each pair has probably been through a couple hundred miles, and I am happy to report that none have developed holes or major signs of wear, so top marks all around on that front. I would note, however, that the Drymax sock has lost its heavily cushioned feel, which is not the case with the Bridgedale. The Drymax are also showing early signs that holes are on their way in the heel in maybe another 100 miles or so. The Bridgedales look pretty much as they did the first day I put them on, as do the Darn Tough, so if I had to pick wear winners, these two would be tied, with Drymax a respectable second.

My Favorite?

Tough call, but for all around non-issues, I think the Bridgedale wins out. I loved the padded feel of the Drymax, and its ability to mold into pretty much any shoe I put them in, but also felt like the sock lost some of that pad with wear. The Bridgedales, while not as padded out the box, have maintained their extra padding in major contact areas. They look and feel like they still have a ton of life left in them after a couple hundred miles, and, as noted above, the tallest complement I can give them is that I rarely think about them when running, regardless of the shoe they are in. The ‘slippy’ nature of the Darn Tough was my biggest disappointment of any of the socks, although this is dependent on the shoe. Once I learned which shoes to pair them with, I found them to be highly responsive, yet tough, despite being significantly thinner than the other two pairs. The Darn Tough strikes me as a good racing sock on less technical trail.

***

Bridgedale Store Page>>

Darn Tough Store Page>>

Drymax Store Page>>

***

RecoFIT Compression Calf Sleeve

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

By Stuart Barrington

RecoFIT Calf Sleeve_1

Info from the company website:

RecoFIT’s calf compression units’ superior design and materials include:

GreatFiTTM
Gradient Recovery Exercise & Activity Technology delivers gradient compression where it’s needed most to reduce negative exercise and travel effects and maximize recovery. Careful pattern making and construction provide gradient compression from the ankle up towards the knee, helping to return the blood to the heart.

ResistexTM
Negative-ion circulation assistance through Resistex carbon yarns increases blood oxygenation and supports the immune system as well as offering ribbed massage, compression, moisture-management and breathability.

Superior Materials
The finest breathable and most comfortable Italian fabrics and flat-seam construction that do not bind or irritate. The contour and cross-grain-cut of the fabric provides maximum compression benefits.

Versatility and Performance
Recofit components are more versatile and specific than shorts, tights or socks.

Left and Right Specific
Maximum benefits result from left- and right-specific components, as well as a wide range of sizes to best suit individual needs.

RecoFIT Calf Sleeve_2

Although designed by a cyclist who suffered from shin-splints for running, I have been wearing them for both sports. I have logged over 100 bike miles (longest ride 75 miles) and nearly 100 running miles (longest run 20 miles) on them in recent weeks. Here’s my take.

At first appearance they look too short, and too wide or baggy, but, once you have them on, they are snug and supportive. They easily reach from below the knee to below the level of where an ankle high/crew sock would stop. I made the mistake of putting them on the wrong legs to start and thought they were really uncomfortable. Closer inspection revealed the instructions (Left Leg/Front etc…pretty obvious really). The fabric is featherweight and you soon forget you are wearing them. They are constructed out of two panels; the first panel wraps the front of your calf and the seam follows the contour of your gastroc muscle (the bulb shaped one at the top), the rear panel envelops your gastroc. The front panel is stretchy and is ribbed inside which I assume is the Resistex, the rear panel is even stretchier but is a thinner material.

RecoFIT Calf Sleeve_3

There are some discreet logos on the front and side and really that is all there is to them. But do not let this slim description fool: these things are effective! I think a combination of their lightness and the support is amazingly effective. After both long sessions mentioned above I had zero aches or pains and after both of them I followed up with a minimum of an 8 mile run with little complaint the next day.

Specially designed for recovery and exercise (Reco – Recovery/Fit – Fitness) the real beauty of these sleeves is that you do not have to give up your favorite sock, you can mix and match them for cycling and running as I did and I am sure you could use them for hiking or even skiing or snowboarding as well. They do not get overly warm even in black; they are available in white also. They do come in multiple sizes and the company stresses the need for accurate fitting; I was using a size large. They also have some other products in the pipeline to address shin-splints and full leg and arm sleeves. One additional side benefit I noticed was that they took the worst of the beating that my shins take on the trails from low hanging branches etc. So if calf compression is appealing to you, but are unwilling to part with your usual socks these could be the ideal thing.

***

RecoFIT Calf Sleeve Store Page>>

***

Rocky Mountain National Park (Lumpy Ridge)

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

By Nick Clark

CIMG2056

Not just for rock climbers. Not even close.

It was early June and word had it that the lower trails in Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) were largely clear of snow: Finally, some one-on-one time with the beautifully maintained trails at Rocky, and some higher-elevation training to boot. Now the only decision to make was which section of the 265,000-acre park to visit. With over 350 miles of trail, the choices are endless, especially later in the summer when every inch of dirt is clear of its snowy winter coat.

CIMG2015

Knowing the run would have to be at a lower elevation to avoid post-holing through drifts, I decided on an old standby and favorite among local trail runners: the Lumpy Ridge Loop. For bonus mileage, I also decided to throw in a couple of spurs to check out a fast-running waterfall and some interesting rock formations.

The launching point for most visitors to RMNP is Estes Park, which can only be described as a tourist town, but charming nonetheless. Estes still has something of a frontier-town feel, and, tourist destination or not, one cannot help but be blown away by the massive mountain views. Even the drive to Estes, whichever way you come, is sensational.

After a quick email to the Fort Collins Trail Runner listserv the day before, I was able to round up four companions for the morning’s outing. From Fort Collins/Loveland, the route to Estes is simple: Follow the Big Thompson River up the canyon via Highway 34. For the Lumpy trailhead, which actually sits outside the park proper, you’ll need to make a right at the small town of Drake, driving past some great lower-elevation mountain trailheads until you hit the high plateau where you’ll be greeted by breathtaking views of the iconic Front Range 14er peaks of Longs and Meeker.

By the time we hit the high plateau, we had already gained close to 3,000 feet in elevation from our starting point 30 miles east at the base of the Front Range. The Lumpy Ridge/Twin Owls trailhead lies at 7,870 feet, and is located off Devil’s Gulch Road, half a mile east of McGregor Ranch and a few miles north of Estes Park. It offers a large paved parking lot and pit outhouses, but no water.

It was 8:00 in the morning and the lot was already half full; by the time we were done with our four-hour run the parking lot was at capacity. This is a very popular part of the park, partly because it offers free entry, but also because there are some wonderful spots to visit within two miles of the trailhead, and because Lumpy offers some of the best rock climbing in Colorado.

I’ve done this 11-mile loop in both directions and either way it’s a good 3,000 feet of climbing to get around. Today, we made the decision to head clockwise, taking in the faces of Lumpy Ridge first before heading around the backside.

CIMG2045

Heading clockwise, we hit the Black Canyon Trail for the first two to three miles of relatively flat, hard-packed trail. It was windy but sunny, as this part of the trail travels through an open area that is exposed to the elements. Twenty to 30 minutes into the run, after a turn onto the Dark Mountain Trail, we found ourselves under shadow of trees and beginning our first climb of the day, which took us to the high point of the loop at just over 9,000 feet and four miles into the run.

CIMG2029

Making a right (east) at the intersection with the Cow Creek Trail, there is a sharp drop off and fun freewheeling down tight switchbacks. Before we knew it, we were out of the trees running through beautiful meadows and basking in the early morning Colorado sun. Mountain flowers were just blooming and the mountain scenes were close to perfect.

CIMG2036

CIMG2047

At mile six, we came to an intersection with the Bridal Veil Falls Trail and made a left for the one-mile, somewhat-scrambly pitch to one of the parks many, many waterfalls.

CIMG2039

After a quick pit-stop at the falls, we turned around and made our way back to the task at hand. To complete the Lumpy loop, we made a right at the Gem Lake Trail and hunkered down for the two-mile, 1,500-foot climb.

Our second extra-credit spur arrived near the top of the climb, with another short one-mile side trip to check out what is known as Balanced Rock. The name pretty much sums up what we saw.

CIMG2048

Once back on the loop we continued up for another mile before reaching the scenic Gem Lake clearing. Gem Lake is small — Gem Pond would be a more apt name — but beautiful with some wonderful rock formations on one side and a sandy beach on the other. From here, it was a 1.7-mile, 1,000-foot drop back to the parking lot.

CIMG2054

We had saved the best for last, as the views of Rocky Mountain National Park and Estes on the way down are, quite simply, out of this world. From the higher elevations, the vistas of Longs and the other high peaks of the park are massive.

CIMG2059_hi res

As we continued to descend, a number of fantastic clearings opened up, offering more views of the mountains with Lake Estes and Estes Park in the foreground. Given the sunny day, this section’s proximity to the parking lot, and the stunning views, it was no great surprise to be dealing with significant foot traffic.

Once down, we had logged close to 16 miles and 3,000 feet of climbing. We wanted 20 miles on the day, so turned around and climbed back to Gem Lake and beyond, before turning around and heading back down for a total of 20 miles and 4,500 feet of climbing. Phew! A great morning with stunning views on sweet singletrack, and the first high-altitude workout of the summer.

411

Where is it in the World?

Lumpy Ridge is located just north of Estes Park, Colorado in the northeast section of Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP). The trails wind in and out of RMNP and are within an hour of the Front Range towns of Fort Collins, Loveland, Longmont and Denver. Estes offers any amenities a runner might need, but gets busy — very busy — in the summer season. Pick a sunny day to run Lumpy and you’ll be dealing with crowds anywhere within two miles of the main trailhead. Beyond the two-mile radius, you won’t see too many people.

Coming from Fort Collins/Loveland, take Highway 34 west (accessible from I-25) to Drake. Make a right on County Road 43, heading towards Glen Haven. Continue through the very small town of Glen Haven and continue on Devil’s Gulch Road until you see the sign for the Lumpy trailhead to the north.

From Estes Park drive north on McGregor Avenue, accessed from Highway 34 just west of the Stanley Hotel (Steven King’s inspiration for The Shining). After approximately one mile heading north, McGregor Avenue veers east and becomes Devils Gulch Road; continue east past McGregor Ranch, after which you will soon see a sign for the trailhead road.

From Denver, take Highway 36 all the way northwest to Estes and follow directions above. Entry is free.

Map

lumpy-usgs-map

Elevation Profile

elevation profile

Degree of Difficulty

  • Technical: Moderate
  • Physical: Moderate
  • Total Distance: 11-16 miles
  • Total Ascent: 2,500 – 3,500
  • Total Descent: 2,900 – 3,500

What to Expect

The loop is 100% singletrack with two significant climbs of between 1,000 and 1,500 feet. You’ll run on a mix of terrain from smooth hardpack to rocky, rooty, technical singletrack, to pine-blanketed wooded trail. The loop runs through forest, meadows and large open spaces. The grade on the climbs can be very steep in places.

The trailhead is at just under 8,000 feet and the loop climbs above 9,000 feet, so be prepared for colder temperatures if the sun is obscured. The Colorado sun can be deceptively hot, so be sure to cover up or lather up.

***